EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
MINUTES
Present: Bender, Bryant, Jackson,
Prochaska Cue, Scheideler, Siekman,
Whitt, Zorn
Absent:
Aguilar, Fuller, Humes, Latta, Miller
Date:
Wednesday, June 7, 2000
Location:
201 Canfield Administration Building
1.0
Call to Order
Scheideler called the meeting to order at
2:34 PM.
2.0 Announcements
2.1 Meeting with Vice Chancellor Griesen
Scheideler
reported that she met with Vice Chancellor Griesen to discuss the possible use
of Pepsi Funds to award scholarships to faculty/staff dependents. She
noted that admissions received approximately 200 applications yearly from
faculty/staff dependents. She suggested that 20 students could be
targeted for a scholarship of $1000 each. She stated that she will write
a proposal and try to get support from UNOPA and UAAD. She pointed out
that the E.N. Thompson Forum has received another influx of funds.
Prochaska Cue noted that it is important not to consider these
scholarships as a benefit to employees since they cannot be extended to all
faculty and staff. Jackson stated that the Senate needs to continue
working on the issue of transferring employee tuition benefits to dependents.
3.0 Associate Vice Chancellor
Brinkerhoff
3.1 Intellectual Property Ownership
Policy
Scheideler
asked for a status update on the Intellectual Property Ownership Policy.
Associate VC Brinkerhoff stated that it was discussed at the Council of
Academic Officers and that some modest revisions were made to the previous
draft. He noted that central administration is planning to take the
policy to the Board of Regents in July. Scheideler pointed out that the
Academic Senate passed a resolution outlining faculty concerns with the policy.
She stated that the latest draft does not address these concerns,
particularly the document's overall ambiguity. VC Brinkerhoff stated that
he will find out what the process was for revising the document and that he
will check to see what happened with the Senate resolution. He pointed
out that it might be possible to delay its July presentation to the Board of
Regents.
4.0 Approval of 5/25/00 Minutes (Jackson)
Bryant
moved and Bender seconded approval of the minutes. Motion approved.
5.0 Dr. Susanna Finnell, Director of
Admissions
Dr.
Finnell stated that she has been very impressed with the interest shown by the
faculty in regards to admissions since she came to UNL in January. She
noted that a large part of their effort goes toward new student recruitment.
Recruitment strategies include increasing indirect marketing, visiting
high schools in Nebraska, hosting receptions for prospective students on
campus, having extended campus visit programs, and a telecounseling program.
She noted that they focus heavily on recruiting students in Nebraska,
however, she pointed out that they do recruit out of state and have an
international initiative. She stated that she and her staff continue to pursue
other recruiting methods and that they will continue to focus on recruitment.
Dr.
Finnell stated that this year they are conducting a summer honors colloquium on
campus with approximately 200 students attending. She stated that these
students will visit campus and that the program entails considerable faculty
involvement associated with collaborative learning exercises. Scheideler
suggested that the Admissions office should share the program schedule with the
Academic Senate so that more faculty can be involved in the colloquium.
Dr.
Finnell noted that the new Visitor's Center would be helpful in recruiting
students. She stated that they are
hoping to increase enrollment each year and that there must be a sustained
effort in recruitment. She stated that the cost of recruiting a student
has quadrupled in recent years, but that continued funding is necessary if we
want to recruit seriously. She pointed out that it is crucial to let
students know that we are very interested in them. She stated that the
goals of the admissions office are: a) to increase overall enrollment, b)
to increase enrollment of students of color, and c) make the admissions office
a good place to work (in order to retain staff members).
Scheideler
asked if the burden of high school visits places a great deal of stress on the
employees of the admissions office. Finnell responded that the time
involved in the high school visits is taxing on the employees, which has
resulted in a high turnover rate. Scheideler asked whether the recruiters
make contact with the advisors or school administrators. Finnell stated
that in small schools it can be difficult to meet administrators and to make
contacts. Scheideler asked if the extension educators could help in
making these contacts. Finnell stated that they are currently working on
this and she noted that extension might fund a coordinator in the admissions
office. Jackson asked how her office relates/interacts with graduate
admissions. Finnell indicated that the processes are very different and
therefore they do not have a relationship with each other. Finnell
pointed out that there are some inefficiencies in the admissions process that
need to be resolved. She noted that we need to deal differently with
those students admitted with deficiencies. Bryant suggested that goodwill
could be made by having someone available to welcome new students to campus.
6.0 Interim
Vice Chancellor Lewis and Assistant Vice Chancellor Richard McDermott,
Facilities Management and Planning
6.1
Business Services
Interim
Vice Chancellor Lewis stated that in speaking with Interim Chancellor Perlman,
it was decided not to cut custodial services this year. He noted that
they are considering conducting a survey on campus to get a sense of what the
campus community considers to be priority business services.
6.2
Pepsi Funds
Scheideler
stated that the Executive Committee discussed proposals from the Senate for
some of the Pepsi Funds. She noted that the Committee is still in favor
of supporting speakers, but that they are also interested in having small
scholarships available for faculty and staff dependents. Lewis stated
that the Pepsi Advisory Committee welcomes proposals from the Senate. He
pointed out that funding comes in two ways: a) the annual allotment and
b) the endowment itself. He noted that there is flexibility in how the
funds can be used. Zorn asked if the Pepsi contract is unusual compared
to other universities. Lewis pointed out that the big difference is that
UNL received the $11 million up front as a quasi-endowment fund.
6.3
Travel Contract
Interim
Vice Chancellor Lewis stated that the travel contact has been signed with
Travel & Transport. He noted that staff members from Business and
Finance will be meeting with groups on campus to discuss the contract. He
pointed out that this is a five-year contract but that there is a provision
whereby either party can terminate the agreement in 30 days. Scheideler
pointed out that there needs to be a sufficient grace period to allow faculty
to adjust to the new procedures. Lewis stated that he hopes this to be a
customer friendly service with web access to flight schedules.
6.4
Size of Faculty Offices (Bryant)
Bryant
asked how the allotted faculty office size was determined. McDermott
indicated that the office of Institutional Research and Planning was involved
in that decision. He stated that the administration was involved in an
accountability of space 10-15 years ago and that the university must be in
compliance with state guidelines. Bryant pointed out that the current
standard faculty office size is not very and that the university is creating
facilities that do not allow faculty to function efficiently. McDermott
stated that a national association is currently reviewing the standard for office
space. He pointed out that the university uses space inefficiently due to
the lack of appropriate storage facilities.
6.5
Construction On Campus
Interim
Vice Chancellor Lewis stated that construction will begin soon on the parking
garage at 17th & R streets. He stated that there will be
approximately 1,715 stalls in the garage at a cost of less than $9,000 per
stall. He stated that renovation of the Security Mutual building, which
will house the College of Journalism, has begun. He noted that the
renovation of this building includes the parking lot located next to the
building. He stated that the lot on the southwest corner of 16th and Vine
streets would become temporary parking. McDermott pointed out that there
is a state-law mandated 2% assessment placed on each new building for future
repair. He noted that this cost does not include building upkeep and
these costs must be absorbed into their (Business and Finance's) existing
budget.
7.0 Unfinished Business
No
unfinished business was discussed.
8.0 New Business
No new
business was discussed.
The meeting was
adjourned at 4:44 PM. The next meeting of the Executive Committee will be
at 2:30 PM on Wednesday, June 21, 2000 at 201 Canfield Administration Building.
Respectfully submitted, David S. Jackson, Secretary.