January 24, 1997

All Fenced In
The north entrance to the Nebraska Union was closed Wednesday as
construction
on the Union expansion project moved into full swing. According to Larry
Blake, project manager, both of the temporary west entrances are now
open,
and will remain in use during the duration of the 18-month construction
and remodeling project.
Once the project is complete, the temporary west entrance to the
bookstore
will be closed up, and the temporary entrance to the upper level will be
converted into a large window.
Work continues on sanitary sewer lines northwest of the building. Workers
originally planned to bore under the 14th street mall, but later found it
necessary to break up part of the sidewalk and dig a much larger trench.
Blake said the trench should be filled and the walk replaced by Feb. 5.
(Photo by Richard Wright)
Event to Highlight University's Teaching Accomplishments
'Celebration of Teaching' Begins Jan. 31
By Tom Simons
News and Information
Some 80 faculty members as well as university administrators, regents and
state legislators have been invited to participate in a special
"Celebration
of Teaching" dinner and workshop Jan. 31 and Feb. 1 at the Clifford
Hardin Nebraska Center for Continuing Education.
The celebration will showcase the university's accomplishments in
emphasizing
the role of teaching over the last three years, said Al Kilgore,
associate
vice chancellor for academic affairs.
Kilgore said the celebration will highlight individual faculty members
and
academic departments that have been recognized for outstanding teaching
as well as various projects that the university has instituted to promote
teaching.
The projects highlighted will include the institution of the general
education
program in the administration of former Senior Vice Chancellor for
Academic
Affairs Joan Leitzel; the nationally recognized work of seven faculty
members
in an American Association for Higher Education project on peer review of
teaching; and the nationally recognized success of the university's two
FIPSE (Fund for Improvement of Post-Secondary Education) grants from the
U.S. Department of Education.
"We want to bring all of these elements together so we can celebrate
and showcase everything that is happening in at this university,"
Kilgore
said. "We want to say, 'Hey, folks, look at what we've accomplished
the past three years.'"
UNL was one of 12 institutions chosen to participate in the AAHE peer
review
project. In it, seven faculty members (Peg Kennedy and Pam Starr in
music,
Joy Ritchie and Charles Mignon in English, Steve Dunbar and Mel Thornton
in mathematics and Dan Bernstein in psychology) attended a week-long
workshop
conducted by Lee Schulman, then of Stanford University and now president
of the Carnegie Foundation for the Improvement of Teaching. They returned
to work in their departments to develop strategies for enhancing
instruction
through peer review and now work as consultants at other universities
around
the country.
Kilgore said the goal is to extend the peer-review project
universitywide.
"We hope to have peer review become another tool to help us
continually
improve our teaching and to stimulate conversations about teaching among
the faculty," Kilgore said. "We need to talk about that as much
as we talk about our research. We need to think about teaching as a
scholarly
activity, not as another task."
The FIPSE grants were coordinated by Robert "Bud" Narveson,
recently
retired English professor; Leverne Barrett, professor of agriculture
leadership,
education and communication; and Delivee Wright, director of the Teaching
and Learning Center. The purpose of the first three-year grant in 1989
was
find ways to ensure that teaching as well as research is rewarded at UNL.
The project was so successful that the Department of Education gave the
university a second three-year grant in 1992 to enable it to share its
findings
with other institutions.
Next weekend's agenda begins with a reception and dinner Friday night,
when
Pat Hutchings, director of the Teaching Initiative at AAHE, will deliver
the keynote address. The agenda concludes Saturday morning with a series
of seminars and discussions on teaching.
Committee Mulls Over Parking Options
By Kim Hachiya
News & Information
Parking Advisory Committee members began the process of decision making
and policy development at their meeting January 21.
As an advisory committee, the group can recommend changes and help devise
policies and plans governing campus parking. Tad McDowell, parking
manager,
asked the group last month to mull over some options, none of which are
slated for immediate adoption. Nevertheless, input on these ideas is
helpful
and can spawn new ideas, he said.
Demand for parking exceeds supply, he noted, and chances are good that
demand
will increase should two surface lots southwest of the city campus, now
controlled by the city, be dedicated to other uses. The city is
considering
options for Block 35, the surface lot bounded by 10 and 11th streets from
P to Q streets; and the Lincoln Journal Star has an option to purchase
the
"Haymarket" lot, bounded by Ninth and 10th streets, Q to R
streets.
UNL, McDowell said last month, has tended to rely upon city lots and city
streets to absorb some of its parking. However, UNL would like to be more
self-sufficient. Unfortunately, he said, because the university is
land-locked,
purchase of open land for surface parking is prohibitively expensive. And
long-range plans for buildings or other uses within the campus core do
not
include conversion of space to parking.
Among options presented to the committee were:
- prohibiting those who live within a 1- to 2-mile radius of city
campus
from bringing cars to campus;
- incentives for residential students who use lots to
"store"
cars during the week to park farther from residence halls so those who
use
cars daily can park more conveniently;
- providing bus service, particularly at night, to areas of the city
more densely populated by students (such as selected apartment
complexes);
- shifting all residence hall parking to a single numbered
designation,
rather than three as is the current practice. This would be more
administratively
efficient and would end the hassle of changing parking tags should a
student
move from one hall to another. The committee felt this option was good
and
probably will vote on its approval next month.
During discussion, members questioned whether the radius-limitation would
affect employees as well or only apply to students. McDowell said that
should
this idea be adopted, extensive study would be necessary. This is an
option
used successfully by other universities, he said, but added that its
impact
at UNL is unknown because no one knows how many would be affected. And an
exemptions policy, such as for those who need access to handicapped
parking,
would need to be developed.
McDowell said he disagrees with the concept of limiting groups such as
freshmen
from bringing cars and would rather set the limits by geography/proximity
to campus.
"It doesn't matter how you do it, some group will be upset," he
said. "Parking is a no-win situation. Whoever you limit will always
be upset. I would prefer not to limit but to promote more use of
alternative
transportation."
The advisory committee has in the past looked at, and rejected, options
such as sector parking and no-ride area for bicycles. The committee also
was instrumental in developing the policy leading to the building of the
parking structure by Memorial Stadium; the Star-Tran contract for free
use
by UNL students, faculty and staff; and the current shuttle system.
The committee took no action on the discussion items.
The committee also is looking to schedule a spring "campus safety
walk."
Typically this walk begins at 4 a.m. when the campus is dark.
Chair Scott Swenseth said he will check with the chairs of a couple other
campus committees to schedule a date.
Have Questions? Call NUFACTS for Instant Answers
By Mollie Klocksin
IANR Newswriter
Nebraskans who awaken at 3 a.m. wondering what food to pack for a long
car
trip don't have to wait until sunrise to find out.
Instead, they can call the University of Nebraska's Cooperative Extension
Information Center toll free at 800-832-5441 outside Lincoln or 441-7188
in the Lincoln area and get an answer immediately.
Callers welcome the convenience of getting specific questions answered
without
having to call or visit their local extension office during the
traditional
work day, said Dave Varner, coordinator of the statewide NUFACTS program
and a Lancaster County extension educator.
"In a sense, it opens our office 24 hours a day, seven days a
week,"
he said.
The center's 24-hour NUFACTS line offers callers two ways to get
information:
by phone or fax.
The service offers access to about 450 messages based on questions posed
frequently at extension offices across Nebraska.
To request a brochure listing NUFACTS messages, call one of the NUFACTS
numbers. The brochure lists additional numbers that callers need to punch
to hear specific NUFACTS messages or request NUFACTS publications by
fax.
There's no charge to use NUFACTS or receive one of the more than 400
extension
publications by fax.
The brochure listing NUFACTS messages and copies of NUFACTS publications
are also available at extension offices statewide.
NUFACTS began operating July 1, 1996. By the end of last year, 8,724
callers
listened to 13,168 messages and requested 836 documents via fax, Varner
said.
The popularity of topics varies by season, he said. For example, many
callers
requested information about lawn care and gardening during the summer and
food safety during the holidays.
On Election Day, callers inquired about Nebraska's property tax structure
and financing for public education, Varner said. Although NUFACTS' public
policy messages didn't address specific issues on Nebraska's Nov. 5
ballot,
callers apparently wanted some general tax information before heading for
the polls, he said.
"They kept our (four) lines busy the entire day," Varner
said.
Topics vary from traditional extension fare such as agriculture,
nutrition
and home maintenance to newer categories such as environmental
stewardship,
water quality and family life.
Although many people still prefer talking with a live person to punching
numbers on a telephone menu, others may prefer the anonymity of using
NUFACTS,
Varner said.
When calling about sensitive topics such as parenting styles or the
effects
of divorce on children, "people are probably more likely to call the
system anonymously rather than talk with a real person," he
said.
Groundwater Cleanup Technique Developed at NU
By Steve Ress
IANR communications associate
An innovative, yet simple University of Nebraska-developed technique to
clean contaminated groundwater using spray irrigation systems is getting
recognition from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
A two-page description of a sprinkler irrigation technique to clean up
groundwater
contamination, successfully field-tested by NU groundwater researchers,
will be published in EPA's annual "Technology Profiles."
Nearly 25,000 copies of the publication are distributed nationally to
"environmental
decision makers and others interested in innovativetechnologies,"
said
Paul McCauley of EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory in
Cincinnati,
Ohio. It also will be listed on EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation
Internet site.
An NU Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources research team led by
hydrochemist Roy Spalding field tested the technique at an EPA Superfund
cleanup site near Hastings in 1994 and 1995.
"This is a very simple, cost effective and efficient technique that
has a wide range of uses for cleaning up contaminated groundwater,"
said Spalding, who directs UNL's Water Sciences Laboratory.
Cost savings with this method can be significant.
"The average cleanup cost for a Superfund site can reach $27
millioni
to $30 million. Using our sprinkler technique could reduce those costs to
$500,000 or less," Spalding estimates.
Much of the savings stem from using off-the-shelf equipment and
relatively
simple technology.
Common irrigation systems, capped with off-the-shelf nozzles that produce
a fine spray, allow contaminants in the water to be released harmlessly
to the atmosphere. The water then irrigates crops normally.
Testing at the Hastings site confirmed the technique's ability to
significantly
reduce trace levels of solvents such as trichloroethylene,
trichloroethane
and tetrachloroethylene, as well as trace levels of fumigants carbon
tetrachloride
and ethylene dibromide, among others.
"The fine spray releases contaminants to the atmosphere, where they
disperse and most rapidly degrade in sunlight. It's a very simple and
effective
technique," said Spalding.
New ETV Special Presents Cather, Sandoz Stories
Love and loneliness are two of the most popular themes in all of
literature.
The pioneers of the plains experienced both with a fierce intensity. A
new
Nebraska ETV Network special, Love And Loneliness On The Plains,
presents
sensitive and faithful adaptations of stories by Nebraska authors Willa
Cather (shown at right) and Mari Sandoz. The stories are set against the
austere landscape
of the middle west in the late 1800s-a place where souls are tested but
the strength of the human heart reveals itself in unexpected ways. The
half-hour
program airs at 8 p.m. Feb. 8, and repeats at 9:30 p.m. Feb. 24.
Acclaimed actress Julie Harris hosts the program and narrates, with actor
E.G. Marshall providing additional narration. Two stories by Willa Cather
are dramatized-"The Sentimentality of William Tavener" and an
excerpt from O Pioneers! called "Winter Memories." Also
excerpted is the "Mirage" chapter from Mari Sandoz's most
famous
work Old Jules.
"The Sentimentality of William Tavener" tells the story of a
homesteading couple whose love, consumed by the hardships of their lives,
is reawakened by shared memories. "Mirage," from Old
Jules,
presents Jules as a young Swiss man, newly arrived in the remote
Sandhills,
who finds the reality very different from what he had imagined.
"Winter
Memories" from O Pioneers! features one of the most discussed
passages in all of Cather's works, in which Alexandra Bergson, late in
her
unmarried life, is haunted by a recurring dream of a powerful man
carrying
her swiftly across the fields. She says, "...and he was yellow like
the sunlight and there was the smell of ripe cornfields about
him."
The dramatizations are intended to "celebrate the language" of
both distinguished writers, according to producer-director Joel Geyer.
Unlike
many dramatizations, which freely "fill in the blanks" between
the written word and visual representation with newly created dialogue,
Geyer believes that what makes this production unique is that the stories
are conveyed "using the words of the authors and only the words of
the authors."
Geyer believes that in addition to the general public, the program will
be of particular interest to educators, and notes that it has educational
rights "in perpetuity," meaning that educational institutions
can tape the program off-air and use it in classrooms for an unlimited
amount
of time.
The program was videotaped at a variety of Nebraska locations including
Willa Cather's home in Red Cloud and the Stuhr Museum of the Prairie
Pioneer
in Grand Island. Current and former Nebraska actors featured in the
program
include Cork Ramer and Peg Sheldrick ("The Sentimentality of William
Tavener), Steve Shields ("Mirage") and Constance McCord
("Winter
Memories).
Love And Loneliness On The Plains is a production of the
University
ofNebraska-Lincoln Cultural Affairs Unit for broadcast on the Nebraska
ETV
Network. Joel Geyer produced and directed. Jim Underwood and Terry Hatch
were directors of photography, with Alexandru Moscu and Jim Underwood as
editors.
The program was underwritten in part by the Willa Cather Pioneer Memorial
and Education Foundation in association with the Nebraska State
Historical
Society, the Nebraska Arts Council and Nebraskans for Public
Television.
Global View
Fulbright Program Undergoes Funding Cuts . . . Again
By Renae Wotipka
International Affairs Office
The Fulbright Exchange Program, falling victim to the political struggle
over the federal budget, has been hit with significant reductions in
funding
for Fiscal Year 1997. This represents the second consecutive cut in
appropriations
on the part of the U.S. government.
The Fulbright Program was established by Congress in 1946 "to
increase
mutual understanding between the people of the U.S. and the people of
other
countries" through educational exchange. Grants are awarded to U.S.
students, teachers, and scholars to study, teach, lecture and conduct
research
abroad, and for foreign nationals to do likewise in the United
States.
With the passage of the omnibus appropriations bill on Sept. 30, 1996,
Fulbright
funding was set at $98 million for 1997. This represents the second
reduction
in appropriations in as many years. In fiscal 1996, U.S. government
support
totaled $102.5 million, while fiscal 1995 funding stood at $118
million.
One reason for the cut in U.S. support for the Fulbright Program is the
proliferation of exchange programs. According to Ralph Vogel, staff
director
of the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board, there are a
growing
number of small, targeted exchange programs that are receiving a larger
share of federal funds going to support exchanges.
More importantly, however, is pressure to reduce overall government
spending.
"They (legislators) are not saying the Fulbright is not a worthy
program.
But something must be cut," says Vogel. Indeed, the Fulbright
Program
is just one of the educational and cultural exchange programs
administered
by the United States Information Agency that has seen budget reductions
in the past two years.
Although the Fulbright Program's primary source of funding is U.S.
congressional
appropriations, it also receives support from foreign governments and the
private sector. Currently, there are 13 partner nations whose annual
government
contribution equals or exceeds that of the United States, including
Germany
and Japan.
Cuts in U.S. support for the Fulbright threaten foreign support and the
program itself.
According to Barbara Ischinger, executive director of the German-U.S.
Fulbright
Commission, "It is dramatic how cuts on one side are instantly
followed
by cuts on the other side. If this trend continues, the program will have
a hard time to survive."
In an effort to preempt future budget reductions, the Fulbright Foreign
Scholarship Board has prepared a Fulbright National Interest Statement to
highlight the importance of the program to the United States. The
statement
emphasizes that the Fulbright Program is based on a relatively small
taxpayer
investment and has been very cost-effective.
According to the statement, the Fulbright Program "has produced
major
dividends by advancing American interests in the world, by strengthening
the ability of Americans to compete more effectively in a global economy,
and by contributing to better understanding between the United States and
other countries."
The survival of the Fulbright Program depends on grassroots support.
According
to Jane Anderson, executive director of the U.S. Fulbright Association,
"Particularly in the U.S., we need to be talking about the impact of
the Fulbright program on our communities. That's what legislators listen
to."
Back to menu
For questions regarding these Scarlet pages, contact:
dtaurins@unlinfo.unl.edu
(402) 472-8518, Fax: (402) 472-7825