- The process will ensure that faculty tenure rights are protected in accordance with the governing laws of the university and state. Participants in the process must be sensitive to the relevant guidelines of the American Association of University Professors.
- It is recognized that extension agents and state foresters within the Institute of Agriculture & Natural Resources are not protected by tenure. These employees are faculty. Their value and programs will be protected in accordance with the governing laws and personnel policies of the university and state.
- The process shall ensure that the rights of non-tenured faculty and non-academic staff are protected in accordance with the governing laws and personnel policies of the university and state.
Information used in the reallocation and reduction process must be made available to the budget planning participants and affected programs in a timely manner so that corrections and explanations can be made before it is released to the public.
The process shall ensure that administrators, faculty, students, and staff are consulted. A shared definition of the word “consultation” is essential to ensure there is ample opportunity for advice prior to recommendations being developed. Consultation is more than just giving and receiving information; it allows all parties the opportunity and the time necessary to explore and offer alternatives before administrative decisions are made. Deans, directors,3 chairs and heads shall follow procedures as stipulated in their college and unit bylaws and allow advice, input, and discussion by faculty, staff, and, to the extent appropriate, students prior to proposals being submitted by unit administrators. Such consultation is intended to give administrators, students, staff and faculty an opportunity for substantive interactions that go beyond simply sharing information.
One of the keys to the success of this process will be the manner with which the information considered at various stages is handled. In the early stages, it will be critical that those individuals responsible for developing budget reduction/reallocation proposals have an opportunity for candid discussions regarding the wide range of options open to them. Such candor is likely to occur only if participants are assured that the discussions will remain confidential. As the process moves forward and proposals are developed, it is essential that the scope of these working discussions expand to include units potentially affected by the proposals prior to public release. In the three-phase process that is described in this document, proposals will be made public at the end of Phase Two.
- Inter-Program and Inter-College Relationships
Inter-program and inter-college relationships must be considered during proposed budget reallocation, reduction and planning.
- Implementation timetable for budget reallocations and reductions
The implementation timetable for each reallocation or reduction proposal shall be indicated. The impact of budget reallocations or reductions on students and/or clientele must be carefully considered.
The first and second phases of the process should allow deans, directors, and the Academic Planning Committee the opportunity to propose alternatives while considering reallocation and reduction strategies.