SURVEY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE 101
QUIZ # 8
TRUE/FALSE
____ 1. Habeas Corpus is the 5th Amendment right of criminal
defendants to confront witnesses against them.
____ 2. The 8th Amendment affords indigent defendants the right
to counsel.
____ 3. If a person violates a condition of parole, he or she
does not have the right to counsel.
____ 4. The 5th Amendment is a due process amendment which gives
criminal defendants the right to confront their accusers
and cross examine witnesses.
____ 5. Right to counsel attaches at the point of focus which is
generally defined as being at the time of arrest.
MULTIPLE CHOICE
____ 1. Which of the following is NOT an element of the Miranda
rights?
A. freedom from self-incrimination
B. testifying against self must be voluntary
C. attorney must be present
D. person must be aware of their rights
____ 2. In which circumstances do individuals have a right to an
attorney?
A. alleged misconduct while incarcerated
B. minors in juvenile court
C. alleged misconduct while on parole
D. alleged misconduct while on probation
E. all of the above
F. B and D only
____ 3. Which of the following is necessary to ensure that
capital punishment is being administered
constitutionally?
A. bifurcated proceeding
B. no mandatory death sentences
C. aggravating and mitigating factors must be
considered
D. all of the above are necessary
____ 4. The rule of law which forbids the use of illegally seized
or obtained evidence during a criminal trial is called the:
A. Coram Nobis Rule
B. Change of Venue Rule
C. Exclusionary Rule
D. Amicus Curiae Rule
FILL IN THE BLANK
1. The act of police enticing people to commit crimes is called
________.
2. The moment when defendants qualify to have counsel advise them
is called the _________, which is currently understood to be
at arrest.
3. The case _________ stated that a defendant has been entrapped
if the criminal activity is the product of government agent
creativity.
4. The case _________ stated that there is no right to an
attorney if there was a violation of a condition of parole.
5. The case _________ allowed capital punishment for those
defendants who were 16 years old at the time the crime was
committed.
MATCHING
____ 1. Arizona v. Fulminante A. an illegal confession may be used to impeach a defendant at trial
____ 2. Minnick v. Mississippi B. right to counsel for indigent defendants
____ 3. U.S. v. Salerno C. once a request for counsel is aired, officials must cease questioning the suspects about the case at hand
until counsel is present
____ 4. Gideon v. Wainwright D. right to counsel at point of arrest
____ 5. McCleskey v. Kemp E. individual discrimination must be demonstrated before capital sentence set aside
____ 6. Michigan v. Harvey F. the erroneous admission of a coerced confession at trial does not constitute grounds for an automatic mistrial
____ 7. Furman v. Georgia G. the death penalty is being administered in a biased fashion
____ 8. Gregg v. Georgia H. limited the number of appeals in capital cases
____ 9. Escobedo v. Illinois I. bail may be denied to dangerous defendants
____10. McCleskey v. Zant J. guidelines for capital punishment
ANSWER KEY
QUIZ # 8
TRUE/FALSE
1. False -- Habeas Corpus is contained in the 5th Amendment and it
allows the defendant the right to be informed of any
charges against them without undue delay
2. False -- Right to counsel is contained in the 6th Amendment
3. True
4. True
5. True
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. C -- attorney must be present
2. F -- in juvenile court and during a probation revocation hearing
3. D -- all of the above are necessary
4. C -- exclusionary rule
FILL IN THE BLANK
1. entrapment
2. point of focus
3. U.S. v. Sherman
4. Morrisey v. Brewer
5. Thompson v. Oklahoma
MATCHING
1. F -- Arizona v. Fulminante
2. C -- Minnick v. Mississippi
3. I -- U.S. v. Salerno
4. B -- Gideon v. Wainwright
5. E -- McCleskey v. Kemp
6. A -- Michigan v. Harvey
7. G -- Furman v. Georgia
8. J -- Gregg v. Georgia
9. D -- Escobedo v. Illinois
10. H -- McCleskey v. Zant