N0VEMBER 8, 2001
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
The State of Nebraska has experienced a considerable shortfall in revenues and it appears possible that the University will be asked to reduce both its FY 2002 and FY2003 budgets. Reductions of any magnitude will need to be accomplished in two steps. Step 1 will involve the short-run challenge of identifying reductions from available uncommitted resources. Given that FY02 is well underway, the short-run response will require identifying such funds opportunistically and without elaborate planning and prioritization. Step 1 reductions will be regarded as temporary reductions until Step 2 can be completed. Step 2 will involve incorporating more permanent reductions into the base budget of the University in accordance with our role and mission, our strategic framework, and our academic priorities. The consequence is that the final implementation of the reductions to the base budget may take 2 or 3 years to accomplish, with available uncommitted funds sequestered in Step 1 used to bridge the University until such base budget reductions of Step 2 can be achieved. The processes for both Steps may occur simultaneously.
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING STEP 1 REDUCTIONS
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING STEP 2 REDUCTIONS
FOOTNOTES
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
The State of Nebraska has experienced a considerable shortfall in revenues and it appears possible that the University will be asked to reduce both its FY 2002 and FY2003 budgets. Reductions of any magnitude will need to be accomplished in two steps. Step 1 will involve the short-run challenge of identifying reductions from available uncommitted resources. Given that FY02 is well underway, the short-run response will require identifying such funds opportunistically and without elaborate planning and prioritization. Step 1 reductions will be regarded as temporary reductions until Step 2 can be completed. Step 2 will involve incorporating more permanent reductions into the base budget of the University in accordance with our role and mission, our strategic framework, and our academic priorities. The consequence is that the final implementation of the reductions to the base budget may take 2 or 3 years to accomplish, with available uncommitted funds sequestered in Step 1 used to bridge the University until such base budget reductions of Step 2 can be achieved. The processes for both Steps may occur simultaneously.
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING STEP 1 REDUCTIONS
1. | To the extent feasible, reductions in Step
1 will be across the board, with efforts made centrally to backstop critical
functions to the extent practical. |
|||||||
2. | Communication with internal and external constituencies
by the Chancellor, the Vice-Chancellors, and Deans and Directors will be
as open and timely as circumstances permit. The Chancellor will frequently
advise and seek the views of the Academic Planning Committee and the Academic
Senate Executive Committee. |
|||||||
3. | The University will protect as its highest
priority the ability of students to graduate in a timely fashion. |
|||||||
4. | Essential support to units or programs that
generate revenue will be maintained at a level that does not unduly jeopardize
their ability to do so. Examples of these units include:
|
|||||||
5. | Although reductions are to state appropriations,
all units, regardless of the source of their funding, may be required, where
appropriate, to contribute to Step 1 reductions. Those enterprises that
are wholly or partially self-sustaining, (Auxiliary enterprises), such as
the Residence Halls, the Lied Center, and Intercollegiate Athletics, may
be asked to contribute. |
|||||||
6. | Reductions in academic and support units that
have the effect of shifting costs to other units will not be permitted except
in unusual circumstances. |
|||||||
7. | Funds allocated to non-personnel expenditures,
such as building repair, equipment, classroom improvements and library acquisitions
will be scrutinized to determine where deferrals can occur consistent with
our stewardship responsibilities. |
|||||||
8. | Where possible, reductions will be taken first
in academic and support activities that are more easily reinstituted if
budget resources are restored. |
|||||||
9. | Layoffs/furloughs will only be implemented
to the degree necessary and in accordance with University policies and procedures. |
|||||||
10. | Private funds designated to UNL by the University
of Nebraska Foundation may only be used in accordance with the fund agreement. |
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING STEP 2 REDUCTIONS
1. | Budget reductions will be consistent with the
role and mission of the University, the strategic plan for the University
as a whole and strategic plans of the various units within the University.
In this context and until the budget situation improves, the focus should
be on preserving strength, advancing the priorities of the University, and
preserving the most vital missions of the University. The ultimate objective
is to preserve the strongest and most competitive University current circumstances
permit. |
||||||||||
2. | Budget reductions will be determined in accordance
with established procedures which include the bylaws of the Board of Regents,
the bylaws of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the "Procedures to
be Invoked for Significant Budget Reallocations and Reductions" dated
2/20/93(1), and Chapter 100 of the Business Policies and Procedures Manual. |
||||||||||
3. | The highest priority will be accorded to the
ability of the University to recruit and retain students. The future of
the State of Nebraska depends on our retaining Nebraska students in the
state and attracting new students to the state.
|
||||||||||
4. | The second priority will be to maintain a robust
research and scholarly enterprise. Essential support to funded research
programs and research support units will be maintained at a level that does
not unduly jeopardize the continuation or growth of external funding. |
||||||||||
5. | The third priority will be those service functions
that contribute to economic development throughout the State of Nebraska.
Other service programs will be evaluated on a case by case basis. |
||||||||||
6. | There is a high degree of mutual interdependence
among University programs, regardless of the source of funding. Although
reductions will be in state appropriations, auxiliary enterprises funded
from other sources may be asked to contribute. |
||||||||||
7. | Prior commitments will be subject to reassessment
within the context of the current budget situation. |
||||||||||
8. | Administrative consolidation will be a high
priority where cost savings can be achieved. |
||||||||||
9. | Reductions in academic and support units that
have the effect of shifting costs to other units will not be permitted except
in unusual circumstances. |
||||||||||
10. | Funds allocated to non-personnel expenditures,
such as building repair, equipment, classroom improvements and library acquisitions
will be scrutinized to determine where deferrals can occur consistent with
our stewardship responsibilities. |
||||||||||
11. | Where possible, reductions will be taken first
in academic and support activities that are more easily reinstituted if
budget resources are restored. |
||||||||||
12. | Layoffs/furloughs will only be implemented
to the degree necessary and in accordance with University policies and procedures. |
||||||||||
13. | Private funds designated to UNL by the University
of Nebraska Foundation may only be used in accordance with the fund agreement. |
FOOTNOTES
(1) After a significant budget reduction in 1992, Chancellor Graham Spanier charged a broadly representative committee to develop a process that was flexible and yet permitted broad participation. The Committee developed a proposal during the summer of 1992 which was ultimately adopted by the Academic Planning Committee in November, 1992 and the Academic Senate in December, 1992. ASUN approved it in February, 1993 and shortly thereafter the Academic Planning Committee promulgated the procedures. These procedures are referenced in the UNL Bylaws. |